The
work of God is done by the will of God. Indeed whether
a work is from God or not does not depend on the success
of the human instrument. It depends on whether or
not it is done according to the will of God. Supernatural
success or failure depends on God. Evangelical Protestants
would do well to remember this. They easily interpret
their wealth and their great following as a sign of
the work of God. On the last day when they tell the
Judge: “Lord, Lord have not we prophesied in thy
name, and cast out devils in thy name and done many
miracles in thy name? Jesus “will profess unto
them, I never knew you: depart from me, you that work
iniquity.” Because in doing these works they did
not the will of the Father but their own. (Matt. 7,
21-23) Remember the beatitudes read: “Blessed are
the poor…”
What
is striking in the life of Archbishop Lefebvre is
that he always followed God’s will. As he was wont
to say, he preferred to follow Providence rather than
precede it. His vocation, like all true vocations
was a call of God: “You have not chosen me: but
I have chosen you.” (Jn. 15, 16) He simply answered.
His going to the French seminary in Rome was not his
decision. It was the decision of God as expressed
by his parents. He would have preferred to study at
the local seminary. It was to have a profound influence
on him. His going to Gabon
as a missionary was the result of God’s call through
his brother René who was already there. All he wanted
was to be a parish priest in his native city. By
asking and obtaining permission to leave for the missions
he saw it as the will of God. It protected him against
the modernist influences prevalent in France.
He received different appointments as a member of
the Holy Ghost fathers which he always accepted.
He was chosen to be a bishop and not only a bishop,
but first archbishop of Dakar and papal delegate for
all of French speaking Africa. God was obviously
preparing him for his future and real mission.
He
was appointed to the Central Preparatory Commission
of the Council where he witnessed the great divisions
between powerful churchmen. In 1968, after he resigned
as superior general of the Holy Ghost Fathers, rather
than preside over the destruction of his order, he
just wanted to remain in Rome as chaplain of a convent
of sisters. He was at the age of retirement and thought
he had done his duty.
But
of course God had other plans, and we all know the
rest of the story. God sent him seminarians who were
looking for a true formation which was denied them
even in Rome. He tried to find them a proper seminary.
He didn’t set out to found the Society at once. He
tried to get out of it. It was only when he realized
God was pushing him to it that he decided to go ahead.
He sought and received Church approval in the person
of Mgr Charričre, bishop of Fribourg; another sign
of God’s will. Later he received the praise and approval
from Rome in the person of Cardinal Wright, prefect
of the congregation of the clergy. He even received
permission to incardinate members into his society.
At each step Divine Providence intervened to set up
the Society with full Church approval. So much so
that we can say that the Society was not so much the
work of the Archbishop as of Providence who wanted
to use the Archbishop and his Society as the means
of resisting the modernist destruction of the Church.
Providence guided at every step and the Archbishop
simply followed along.
This
is why many faithful, not just from France,
but from all over the world: Europe, North and South
America, Oceania, Asia and Africa followed his lead.
Divine Providence sent him young people seeking the
true priesthood and religious life pushing him into
the Society. He did not wake up one day and decide
to start an order of nuns. One day a young lady from
Australia
appeared at his door saying she wanted to be a nun
and she was not leaving until he did something for
her. He called his sister Mother Mary Gabrielle and
the Society sisters were founded. And his influence
was not only over the SSPX, it was over the whole
Church. Archbishop Sheen once said: a bishop, as
a successor of the Apostles is first of all for the
Church before he is for a diocese. This was verified
in Archbishop Lefebvre. Religious men and women:
the Dominicans, the Capuchins, the Benedictines, the
Redemptorists, the Carmelites
[1] etc., realizing he was simply following Providence
decided to follow him, certain they would not be mislead.
He was almost the second founder of these orders.
It is here you see the role of a bishop in the Church.
God,
who does everything with order, always provides for
his Church. It is clear he provided Archbishop Lefebvre,
the prelate predicted by Our Lady of Good Success
at Quito in 1634. The Archbishop was not a self appointed
defender of the Faith but a providentially appointed
one. He had done God’s will all his life; he would
simply continue to do so. It is important to remember.
If in 1976 he continued his seminary and proceeded
with the ordinations despite the prohibition from
Rome it was not out of stubbornness but because he
saw it as God’s will to provide priests who would
continue the true Mass. If he proceeded with the
Episcopal consecrations of 1988 it was clear to him
God was continuing to push him in that direction because
of circumstances beyond his control.
This
is why the Holy Ghost chose a legitimate bishop to
lead the resistance and allowed his Society to be
officially approved by the Church. This is where
his legitimacy, authority and mission come from.
This is our guaranty that he was doing God’s will
and that we in our turn are doing God’s will by following
him. It is not an insignificant thing. In these
times of great confusion when there are so many self
appointed “doctors in Israel”,
theologians, canonists who think they are experts
just because they can read the books. The self appointed
sedevacantist bishops have absolutely no legitimacy,
no authority or mission in the Church. All these people
do is create division, confusion, leading people away
from the Mass and the sacraments because of their
opinions. The sedevacantists don’t have a pope because
they don’t need a pope. They have all the infallible
sedevacantists who pontificate in his place!
Those
who have left the Society, without proper dispensation,
in order to remain independent, have placed themselves
out of and have lost the legitimacy, authority and
mission. I venture to say that many of those who
have abandoned the SSPX have done so, not because
of theological reasons but because of self will.
It almost always came down to a question of obedience.
What guaranty do we have that they are doing God’s
will and not their own? None, absolutely none! There
are some who actually like the crisis because it is
a convenient excuse for them to do as they please
without having a bishop or superior or Church structure
to oversee them. This type of priest is not new in
the Church. At the time of the Council of Trent these
unattached clerics were a source of scandal and detriment
to the Church. This is why the Sacred Council decreed
that “no one hereafter be ordained who is not attached
to the church or pious place for whose necessity or
benefit he is received.” Hiding behind the crisis
is not a justification since Our Lord did give us
the solution which they abandoned.
Please
remember St Joseph’s Bursary in your almsgiving during
the season of Advent. Have a holy Advent and a blessed
Christmas.
With
continued prayers and my blessing,
Father
Jean Violette