The response of the Society
of St Pius X to Rome:
A theological study on the nocivity of the New Mass:
The
Problem of the Liturgical Reform
During the recents discussions between
Rome and the Society of St Pius X, Bishop Fellay offered to the Sovereign
Pontiff a doctrinal study on the liturgical reform of 1969, so called
the Novus Ordo Mass, which is at the core of our critics of Rome. Bishop
Fellay joined to that study his “address to the Holy Father” which we
publish here. Following this, you will find a commentary by Father François
Laisney.
ADDRESS TO THE
HOLY FATHER
Holy Father,
More than thirty
years ago, under your predecessor, Pope Paul VI, a major reform modified
the Latin rite of the Catholic Liturgy, especially the "Order of
the Mass."
This reform immediately
raised troubles and controversies across the entire world. Some studies
which were made, notably the "Brief Critical Examination of the Novus
Ordo Missae" given to Pope Paul VI by Cardinals Ottaviani and Bacci,
pointed out the troubling deficiencies and ambiguities affecting this
reform.
The Liturgy has
certainly evolved over the course of history, as is shown by the reforms
made during the past century by St. Pius X, Pius XII and John XXIII. But
the post-conciliar liturgical reform, by its extension and brutality,
represents a disturbing upheaval, as a radical rupture from the traditional
Roman Liturgy. Above all, this reform contains disconcerting elements,
ambiguous and dangerous for the faith.
Before this spiritual
danger, the true obedience to the Seat of Peter, the true submission to
the Church Mother and Mistress obliges us, along with a great number of
Catholics around the world, to remain faithful no matter the cost to this
venerable Liturgy which the Roman Church has celebrated for centuries,
the Liturgy which you yourself have celebrated in the past. Such is the
sacred heritage which the founder of our Priestly Fraternity of Saint
Pius X, Archbishop Lefebvre, has entrusted to us: "It is clear, it
is evident that the entire drama between Ecône and Rome is due to the
problem of the mass. (…) We are convinced that the new rite of Mass expresses
a new faith, a faith which is not ours, a faith which is not the Catholic
Faith; (…) that this new rite is misleading and, if I may say, supposes
another conception of the Catholic Religion. (…) This is why we are attached
to this Tradition which is expressed in such an admirable manner, and
in a definitive manner, as Pope St. Pius V said so well, in the sacrifice
of the Mass" (June 29, 1976).
After much reflection
and prayer, we feel the duty before God to address the Holy Father once
again with regard to this problem of the Liturgy. We have asked those
pastors of souls who are qualified in theological, Liturgical and Canonical
matters, to compose a synthesis of the certain difficulties, including
the most important ones, which the Liturgy of the post-conciliar reform
poses to the faith of Catholics.
This work has sought
to go back to the doctrinal causes properly so called of the actual crisis,
bringing to light the principles which are at the origin of the Liturgical
reform and contrasting them with Catholic doctrine.
The reading of
this document manifests clearly, we believe, that the "theology of
the paschal mystery," to which the door was left open at the occasion
of Vatican II, is the soul of the liturgical reform. Because it minimizes
the mystery of the Redemption, because it considers the sacrament only
in its relation with the "mystery," and because the conception
that it makes of the "memorial" alters the sacrificial dimension
of the Mass, this "theology of the paschal mystery" renders
the post-conciliar Liturgy dangerously distant from Catholic doctrine,
to which however the Christian conscience remains bound forever.
Holy Father,
The Catholic Faith
imposes upon us a grave obligation not to remain silent about the questions
which assail our mind.
Are not the deficiencies
of this theology and of the liturgy which issues from it one of the principal
causes of the crisis affecting the Church for more than thirty years?
And does not such a situation demand the doctrinal and liturgical clarifications
on the part of the supreme Authority of the Church? Do not the subjects,
for whose good a law is made, have the right and duty, if the law manifests
itself harmful, with filial confidence to demand from the legislator its
modification or its abrogation?
Among the measures
which are the most urgent, does it not seem appropriate to make publicly
known that every priest possesses the faculty to use the integral and
fruitful Roman Missal revised by St. Pius V, a treasure so profoundly
rooted in the thousand-year Tradition of the Church, Mother and Mistress?
These doctrinal
and liturgical clarifications, joined with the universal renewal of the
traditional Roman Liturgy, would not fail to produce immense spiritual
fruits: the restoration of the true notion of the priesthood and of sacrifice,
and consequently, the renewal of priestly and religious sanctity; the
increase of fervor in the faithful; the strengthening of the unity of
the Church; the powerful momentum for the evangelization of former Christian
nations and of infidel nations.
We strongly beseech
Your Holiness, who alone has the power as Successor of Peter and Shepherd
of the universal Church, to strengthen his brethren in the faith and to
sanction with his apostolic authority the indispensable clarifications
which are demanded by the present tragic situation in the Church.
However, such a
necessary restoration cannot be done in the Church without an extraordinary
recourse to the Holy Ghost, obtained by the intercession of the Blessed
Virgin Mary. It is, therefore, by prayer, especially by the holy sacrifice
of the Mass, that this long desired renewal will be accomplished, and,
for our part, it is to this, with the grace of God, that we give ourselves
and desire to give ourselves always more.
Deign, Your Holiness,
to accept our sentiments of filial respect in Jesus and Mary.
+Bernard Fellay
Superior General
Of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X
At Flavigny, France,
on the feast of the
Presentation of the Lord, February 2, 2001.
Home
| Contents
|