Convictions

Français
April - June 2008, No. 12
 
Editorial
About Polemics and Dialogue
By Rev. Fr. Patrick Girouard SSPX

 

M. l`abbé Patrick Girouard

 

We quite often hear liberal Catholics say we must seek dialogue with those who are in error and not start polemics. In other words, we should not look at what separates us, but to the truths we have in common. Truth is so splendid that it will prevail, without us having to fight against errors. Well, I just came across a press release from Zenith (dated May 14th last) that reports these views are held by none other that His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI. The Pope was explaining how some writings from the so-called “Pseudo-Dionysius”, a theologian from the 6th century, would be useful to understand better the nature of “dialogue”. After quoting these words of the Pseudo-Dionysius: “I would not like to cause polemics; I simply speak of the truth; I seek the truth,” the Pope said: “And the light of truth by itself makes error fade and makes what is good shine. With this principle he purified Greek thought and related it to the Gospel. (…) This principle, which he affirms in his seventh letter, is also the expression of a true spirit of dialogue: It is not about seeking the things that separate, one must seek the truth in Truth itself; this, then, shines and causes errors to fall. (…) Precisely when one enters into the depths of the encounter with Christ, an ample space for dialogue also opens. When one finds the light of truth, he realizes that it is a light for everyone; polemics disappear and it is possible to understand one another, or at least, speak to one another, draw closer together.”

I found a few quotes from three encyclicals of Pope Leo XIII that contradict this opinion, and that explain why Catholics must uncover and fight energetically against errors, and why it is the duty of the State to repress them, i.e. to not give them any liberty. (I.E. The State must only tolerate them when their repression would cause a greater evil). These traditional texts are in complete opposition with Vatican II and the modern Popes…

1-“Immortale Dei”, November 1st, 1885
“The defense of Catholicism, indeed, necessarily demands that in the profession of doctrines taught by the Church all shall be of one mind and all steadfast in believing; and care must be taken never to connive, in any way, at false opinions, never to withstand them less strenuously than truth allows.” (Paragraph # 46)

2-“Libertas Praestantisimum”, June 20th, 1888
“Men have a right freely and prudently to propagate throughout the State whatsoever things are true and honorable, so that as many as possible may possess them; but Iying opinions, than which no mental plague is greater, and vices which corrupt the heart and moral life should be diligently repressed by public authority, lest they insidiously work the ruin of the State. The excesses of an unbridled intellect, which unfailingly end in the oppression of the untutored multitude, are no less rightly controlled by the authority of the law than are the injuries inflicted by violence upon the weak. And this all the more surely, because by far the greater part of the community is either absolutely unable, or able only with great difficulty, to escape from illusions and deceitful subtleties, especially such as flatter the passions. If unbridled license of speech and of writing be granted to all, nothing will remain sacred and inviolate; even the highest and truest mandates of natures, justly held to be the common and noblest heritage of the human race, will not be spared. Thus, truth being gradually obscured by darkness, pernicious and manifold error, as too often happens, will easily prevail.” (Paragraph # 23)

3-Sapientiae Christianae, January 10th, 1890
“But in this same matter, touching Christian faith, there are other duties whose exact and religious observance, necessary at all times in the interests of eternal salvation, become more especially so in these our days. Amid such reckless and widespread folly of opinion, it is, as We have said, the office of the Church to undertake the defense of truth and uproot errors from the mind, and this charge has to be at all times sacredly observed by her, seeing that the honor of God and the salvation of men are confided to her keeping. But, when necessity compels, not those only who are invested with power of rule are bound to safeguard the integrity of faith, but, as St. Thomas maintains: ‘Each one is under obligation to show forth his faith, either to instruct and encourage others of the faithful, or to repel the attacks of unbelievers.’ (Summa Theologiae, IIa IIae, Q.3, Art. 3, Ad 2) To recoil before an enemy, or to keep silence when from all sides such clamors are raised against truth, is the part of a man either devoid of character or who entertains doubt as to the truth of what he professes to believe. In both cases such mode of behaving is base and is insulting to God, and both are incompatible with the salvation of mankind. This kind of conduct is profitable only to the enemies of the faith, for nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good.” (Paragraph # 14)

What a difference between these wonderfully clear and enlightening texts of a truly Catholic spirit, and those of the modern Church, which reek of sentimentality and naiveté! What a true guidance they are still providing us with! Truly Catholic Popes were not “dialoguing” with error, and were not trying to avoid “polemics”. They recognized how easily it is for the majority of people to be led astray by error and, consequently, to lose their souls. Therefore, whenever we hear such nonsense as described in my introduction, let us remember the words of Pope Leo XIII, and let us answer back with the truth! ?